Lajez v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, if the harm results from an omission, the omission must be intentional, and the actor must either know the omission will result in damage or the circumstances surrounding the failure to act must allow an implication of reckless disregard
• finding the owner of food service company was not 22 required to qualify as expert to offer opinion testimony as to how a specialized diet would 23 add costs to his business
• “The right of a petitioner under the [LOL Act] to implead third parties in the course of litigation is clear.”
• “To the extent this failure was negligence, Transocean was aware that its crews lacked training about the proper use of diverters, and therefore this negligence was within Transocean's privity and knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).