Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the law of the ease doctrine applies only to those issues decided expressly or by necessary implication.”
• noting that the appellate court “appreciate[d] the dilemma in which the [trial] court found itself on remand”
• noting that the appellate court “appreciate[d] the dilemma in which the [trial] court found itself on remand”
• commenting that a cross-appeal is unnecessary for a party to present alternative arguments for affirmance of a trial court's decision
• recognizing “the dilemma in which the [district] court found itself on remand”
• noting that the Supreme Court construes its own mandate, and “[l]ogically, if the Supreme Court has plenary power to construe its own mandate, so must this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).