Laird v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer is not required to establish work availability once it is established that all of a claimant’s disability related to the work-injury has ceased
• terxnination proper where referee accepted employer’s expert medical testimony that claimant was totally recovered even though he had no reason to question the claimant’s complaints of pain
• termination proper where referee accepted employer's expert medical testimony that claimant was totally recovered even though he had no reason to question the claimant's complaints of pain
• “[The physician] consistently testified that Claimant recovered from his injury. This testimony constitutes substantial evidence to support the disputed finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).