Skip to main content
· 7/20/1987

Laird v. Ely & Bernard

Citations

  • 528 A.2d 1379
  • 365 Pa. Super. 95
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • quashing pro se pro se brief were so substantial that meaningful review was not possible
  • where defects in appellant’s pro se brief are so substantial that meaningful review is not possible, Superior Court will quash the appeal
  • typographical changes made for clarity and consistency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Kelly, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.