Skip to main content
· 5/6/1996

Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

Citations

  • 925 F. Supp. 624
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20392
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9692
  • 1996 WL 263246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that after careful consideration of all decisions on the issue, the court found the majority decisions less persuasive
  • “Plaintiffs clearly assert claims for damage above and beyond any mere disappointed commercial expectations or desire to enjoy the benefit of their alleged agreement with defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.