· 12/15/1983
Laguna Village, Inc. v. Laborers' International Union of North America
Citations
- 672 P.2d 882
- 35 Cal. 3d 174
- 197 Cal. Rptr. 99
- 1983 Cal. LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \the federal removal statute. . . expressly prohibit[s] any proceeding in state court after removal and prior to remand\
- holding a timely answer filed in District Court following timely removal of the action is sufficient to prevent a default in a state court if the case is subsequently remanded
- “[A] motion to dismiss, timely filed in federal court following removal of the case from state court and prior to remand, constitutes a responsive pleading to the state complaint.”
- “A 27 || proper filing of a notice of removal immediately strips the state court of its jurisdiction.”
- after removal, federal court remanded to state court because no federal issues were presented
- after removal, federal court remanded to state court because no federal issues were presented
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.