Skip to main content
· 12/15/1983

Laguna Village, Inc. v. Laborers' International Union of North America

Citations

  • 672 P.2d 882
  • 35 Cal. 3d 174
  • 197 Cal. Rptr. 99
  • 1983 Cal. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \the federal removal statute. . . expressly prohibit[s] any proceeding in state court after removal and prior to remand\
  • holding a timely answer filed in District Court following timely removal of the action is sufficient to prevent a default in a state court if the case is subsequently remanded
  • “[A] motion to dismiss, timely filed in federal court following removal of the case from state court and prior to remand, constitutes a responsive pleading to the state complaint.”
  • “A 27 || proper filing of a notice of removal immediately strips the state court of its jurisdiction.”
  • after removal, federal court remanded to state court because no federal issues were presented
  • after removal, federal court remanded to state court because no federal issues were presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.