Skip to main content
· 4/5/2000

LaForge v. State, University System

Citations

  • 997 P.2d 130
  • 1 Nev. 415
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1332
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 45
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that res judicata, or issue preclusion, applies when (1) the same issue that was decided in the prior action is presented in the current action; (2) there was a final decision on the merits; and (3
  • stating an “oblique reference” to bylaws in an employment contract did not incorporate by reference the bylaws into the employee’s contract
  • “The general rule of issue preclusion is that if an issue of fact or law was actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, the determination is conclusive in a subsequent action between the parties” (citation omitted)
  • describing the three-part test fok issue preclusion
  • defining collateral estoppel under Nevada law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Agosti, Leavitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.