Lafonta v. Hotard Coaches, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, ‘‘as a threshold issue,’’ defendant’s claimed alternative ground for affirmance that plaintiff lacked standing, and, therefore, trial court lacked sub- ject matter jurisdiction
• in determining standing, ‘‘[i]t is well settled that one who [is] neither a party to a contract nor a contemplated beneficiary thereof cannot sue to enforce the promises of the con- tract’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• in determining question of standing, court does not consider merits of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).