Laffin v. Chemical Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When an officer or supervisor fails to perform the employer’s duty, the failure is that of the employer, not the officer or supervisor”
• reference to breach of personal duty “over and beyond” the duty to the employer
• “[S]ec. 102.29 provides that a workers’ compensation claim shall 'not affect the right to maintain an action in tort against a third party. Employees are within the class of ‘third parties’ within the meaning of the act.” (Citations, quotation marks, and brackets omitted.)
• \[S]ec. 102.29 provides that a workers' compensation claim shall not affect the right to maintain an action in tort against a third party. Employees are within the class of `third parties' within the meaning of the act.\ (Citations, quotation marks, and brackets omitted.
• \[S]ec. 102.29 provides that a workers' compensation claim shall not affect the right to maintain an action in tort against a third party. Employees are within the class of `third parties' within the meaning of the act.\ (Citations, quotation marks, and brackets omitted.)
• immunity of the president and a superintendent of a company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).