Lafferty v. Schuyl. River R.
Citations
- 124 Pa. 297
- 16 A. 869
- 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1034
Syllabus
<p>1. A landowner may continue in the cultivation of liis land after the location of a railroad upon it, until actual entry by the company, and may recover compensation, not only for injuries to the land, but for the loss of growing crops planted before bond given or notice of an intent to enter for construction.</p> <p>2. So, a tenant to whom the land is demised after tlie location of the line and with notice thereof, may recover for all his growing crops, destroyed by the construction, which were planted before lie had notice of the time when his possession would be interfered with by the company.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that finding good cause to permit absence from a parole revocation hearing does not signify finding good cause for accepting hearsay testimony
- order revoking parole cannot be based entirely upon hearsay testimony.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Greejn, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.