Skip to main content

Lafferty v. Schuyl. River R.

Citations

  • 124 Pa. 297
  • 16 A. 869
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1034

Syllabus

<p>1. A landowner may continue in the cultivation of liis land after the location of a railroad upon it, until actual entry by the company, and may recover compensation, not only for injuries to the land, but for the loss of growing crops planted before bond given or notice of an intent to enter for construction.</p> <p>2. So, a tenant to whom the land is demised after tlie location of the line and with notice thereof, may recover for all his growing crops, destroyed by the construction, which were planted before lie had notice of the time when his possession would be interfered with by the company.</p>

Judges: Clark, Greejn, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.