Skip to main content
· 7/17/2000

Lafferty v. Reliance Insurance

Citations

  • 109 F. Supp. 2d 837
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10624
  • 2000 WL 1146573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that once insured rejected UM/UIM coverage, insurer had no obligation to reoffer coverage or obtain rejection forms for subsequent renewals
  • finding that rejection form stating that UM/UIM limits “cannot be greater than B.I. limits” was sufficient to inform the insured that it could obtain coverage up to the liability limits
  • such so-called “fronting agreements” have effect of making insured a self-insurer
  • such so-called “fronting agreements” have effect of making insured a self-insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.