Skip to main content
· 4/11/1905

Lafferty Mfg. Co. v. Acme Ry. Signal & Mfg. Co.

Citations

  • 138 F. 729
  • 71 C.C.A. 285
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “striking a defense from a pleading is a drastic remedy generally disfavored by courts.”
  • construing as denials defenses that do not attempt to avoid liability while admitting the facts of the complaint, but rather deny the complaint’s allegations outright or identify a defect or lack of evidence in the plaintiff’s case
  • “When a defendant mislabels a specific denial as a defense, the proper remedy is to treat the claim as a denial, not to strike it.”
  • “When a defendant mislabels a specific denial as a defense, the proper remedy is to treat the claim as a denial, not to strike it.”
  • “a defense that simply points out a defect or lack of evidence in a plaintiff’s case is not an affirmative defense.”
  • “[T]his Court joins the growing number of courts in this circuit and others in finding that a lower pleading standard applies to affirmative defenses. Such an approach is faithful both to the letter and the spirit of Rules 8(b) and (c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Grosscup, Jenkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.