Skip to main content
· 3/25/1963

LaFayette Hotel Co. v. Gordon & Ferguson

Citations

  • 236 Ark. 318
  • 365 S.W.2d 857
  • 1963 Ark. LEXIS 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s fingerprint on broken kitchen window sufficient to sustain burglary conviction even though defendant may have been in living room once before
  • The testimony that the witness was “pretty sure” the defendant had been to the house before the burglary was not an innocent explanation of why the defendant’s fingerprints were found on the window used to gain entry.
  • The testimony that the witness was “pretty sure” the defendant had been to the house before the burglary was not an innocent explanation of why the defendant’s fingerprints were found on the window used to gain entry.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dismiss, Harris, McFaddin, Ward, Would

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.