Lafaye v. Timmerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a party receives an order granting certain relief not previously contemplated or presented to the trial court, the aggrieved party must move pursuant to Rule 59(e
• explaining that a motion to alter or amend a judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) is not inconsistent with the Probate Code and is therefore applicable
• holding that when a party receives an order granting certain relief not previously contemplated or presented to the trial court, the aggrieved party must move pursuant to Rule 59(e), SCRCP, to alter or amend the judgment in order to preserve the issue for appellate review
• holding when a party receives an order that grants certain relief not previously contemplated or presented to the trial court, the aggrieved party must move, pursuant to Rule 59(e
• finding that when the family court made the child support award retroactive in its order, the mother needed to raise the issue in a Rule 59(e) motion to preserve her argument on appeal
• making no indication of the total value of the testator’s estate where the transfers to spouse totaled $1,191,000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).