LaFaro v. Cahill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an injunction against harassment is a final order from which an appeal is “explicitly permit[ted]” by what is now A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(5)(b)
• concluding defendant’s name-calling was not “directed at” the plaintiff where it was contained in a conversation with an unrelated third party which the plaintiff overheard
• holding that injunction against harassment may not restrict political speech
• stating that this court reviews an injunction against harassment for an abuse of discretion
• stating that this court reviews an injunction against harassment for an abuse of discretion
• stating that § 12-2101 “explicitly permits the appeal of injunctions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).