Lafarge Conseils et Etudes v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “a 54(b) ruling in fact has res judicata ramifications, which are potentially very important”
• “Nonetheless, given the size and complexity of this case, we 4 cannot condemn the district court’s effort to carve out threshold claims and thus streamline 5 further litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).