Laeroc Waikiki Parkside, LLC v. K.S.K. (Oahu) Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the. appellant made no discernible argument because it “cite[d] no authority, presented] no analysis as to this argument, and d[id] not explain the relevance of’ the omission complained of
• concluding that an assertion unsupported by a discernible argument need not be considered
• noting that, even if the plaintiffs were claiming to be third party beneficiaries (which they conceded they were not
• adopting “the majority view of the states, [that a nonrecourse] provision is valid to the extent it does not waive liability in situations of intentional or reckless conduct”
• “[P]ublic policy would forbid the making of contracts excluding [from liability] intentional torts.”
• “[T]here is no tort of bad faith outside the context of insurance claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).