Ladzinske v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that case involving dismissal of claim for mandamus relief was within Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction
• holding that, where the underlying subject matter involves review of an administrative ruling, a party must file an application for discretionary appeal in order to invoke the jurisdiction of an appellate court
• explaining that the “rationale for requiring a discretionary application does not apply where the person who seeks to appeal was not a party to the administrative proceedings”
• neighboring landowner seeking to challenge a zoning decision was required to file a discretionary appeal despite the fact that the superior court dismissed the complaint without reaching the merits
• neighboring landowner seeking to challenge a zoning decision was required to file a discretionary appeal despite the fact that the superior court dismissed the complaint without reaching the merits
• examining standing based on relevant ordinance permitting appeal to zoning board of appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).