Ladyhelm Farm, LLC v. Liquor & Cannabis Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming 151-month sentence for defendant even though leader of the conspiracy who pleaded guilty received a 63-month sentence
• “The district judge was not required to reduce [the appellant’s] sentence simply because he — unlike the other defendants — chose to go to trial”
• \The district judge was not required to reduce [the appellant's] sentence simply because he—unlike the other defendants—chose to go to trial\
• \The district judge was not required to reduce Navedo's sentence simply because he -- unlike the other defendants -- chose to go to trial.\
• “In this case, the district court’s explicit concerns were the scope of the crime and the potential for dangerousness. Beyond that, the district court referred generally to ‘the evidence presented during the trial’ as justifying ‘a sentence at the upper end of the advisory guidelines.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).