Lady Di's, Inc. v. Enhanced Services Billing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court ruling that predominance was not satisfied “because the de- tails of each customer’s individual transactions would need to be examined to consider whether the claims for unjust enrichment or statutory deception were proven”
• endorsing this defi- nition of agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).