Ladner v. Mercedes-Benz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Without that [cautionary instruction], the jury was free to reason that plaintiff was a foreseeable user; the standard of care applied to her; she violated the standard; and she would not have been injured had she not done so: ergo, the [product’s] design was not defective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).