Skip to main content
· 11/24/1993

Ladeburg v. Ray

Citations

  • 508 N.W.2d 694
  • 1993 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 245
  • 1993 WL 482342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no prejudice resulted from error in comparative fault instructions when the jury did not find plaintiff at fault
  • finding the plaintiff could not have been prejudiced by the submission of an instruction on her comparative fault when the jury found the defendants were not at fault in response to the first question on the verdict form
  • finding the plaintiff could not have been prejudiced by the submission of an instruction on her comparative fault when the jury found the defendants were not at fault in response to the first question on the verdict form
  • “Error in giving an instruction does not require reversal unless the error is prejudicial.”
  • \Error in giving an instruction does not require reversal unless the error is prejudicial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Carter, Lavorato, Snell, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.