Ladage v. Garland Steamship Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fishing regulation in four-year cycle did not satisfy the exception
• holding there is no reasonable expectation of repetition when agency would be relying on a new biological opinion in the future
• dismissing a case as moot and vacating the judgment below after the issuance of a new biological opinion
• distinguishing Greenpeace Action and holding that challenge to TAC was mooted by issuance of new biological opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).