Lacy v. Lorch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “hold[ing] that claims of discrimination based on a disability arising from military service are not cognizable under USERRA,” citing cases
• rejecting the plaintiff’s state-created danger claim on the ground that the school defendants’ failure to implement an identification system despite knowledge of higher instances of trespassers at the school was a failure to act rather than an affirmative act
• “[A] USERRA plaintiff has the initial burden of demonstrating that his military service, as distinct from a disability resulting from service, was a substantial or motivating factor in the employer’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).