· 11/19/2010
Lacy-McKinney v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.
Citations
- 937 N.E.2d 853
- 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2161
- 2010 WL 4683464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure to comply 13 with HUD servicing responsibilities can properly be raised as an affirmative defense
- “we agree with the reasoning of Denton and view the affirmative defense of noncompliance with HUD regulations as the failure of the mortgagee to satisfy a HUD-imposed condition precedent to foreclosure”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Riley, Bailey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.