Skip to main content
· 6/27/1925

Lacy ex rel. Cruttenden v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Co. of New York

Citations

  • 239 Ill. App. 679
  • 1925 Ill. App. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he plaintiff is represented by counsel and therefore has adequate access to the courts. . . . [T]he plaintiff’s claim that he is being deprived of access to the courts is clearly foreclosed by Bounds v. Smith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.