Lacos Land Co. v. Arden Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motivation behind the challenged vote was not relevant to the determination that the vote was coerced because “[a]s a corporate fiduciary, [the CEO] has no right to take such a position, even if benevolently motivated in doing so”
• holding that motivation behind the challenged vote was not relevant to the determination that the vote was coerced because “[a]s a corporate fiduciary, [the CEO] has no right to take such a position, even if benevolently motivated in doing so”
• “The determination of whether it was inappropriate for [the CEO] to structure the choice of Arden’s shareholders (and its directors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).