Skip to main content
· 7/14/1920

Lacock v. Lacock

Citations

  • 74 Pa. Super. 378
  • 1920 Pa. Super. LEXIS 157

Syllabus

<p>Divorce — Desertion—Justification—Cruel treatment — Condoning treatment.</p> <p>Where a husband has subjected his wife to a long and continued course of ill treatment, amounting to indignities to the person which rendered her condition intolerable, and forced her to leave his home, he will not be granted a divorce on the ground of desertion. When the libellant’s own conduct was the main reason for the respondent’s leaving him, a case of wilful and malicious desertion cannot be said to be proved. Now will the fact of the respondent after first leaving the libellant subsequently returned to him on the promise of good behaviour, be considered a condonation of the previous offenses.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Orlady, Porter, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.