Lack Singletree Co. v. Cherry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarks that the plaintiff “ ‘was good for nothing’ because she said she was in pain and should apply for social security,” while “insensitive and out of line,” were insufficient to sustain a hostile work environment claim under First Circuit precedent
• \11/26/2014 Final Warning Letter regarding attendance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).