Lacey v. Layne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• An ALJ’s failure to cite specific evidence does not establish that the ALJ failed to consider it.
• An ALJ’s failure to cite specific evidence does not establish that the ALJ failed to consider it.
• “[O}pinions that a claimant is ‘disabled’ or ‘unable to work’ are not medical opinions and are not given special significance because opinions as to whether or nota claimant is disabled are reserved for the Commissioner.”
• “[O]pinions that a claimant is ‘disabled’ or ‘unable to work’ are not medical opinions and are not given special significance because opinions as to whether or not a claimant is disabled are reserved for the Commissioner.”
• “[O]pinions that a claimant is ‘disabled’ or ‘unable to work’ are not medical opinions and are not given special significance because opinions as to whether or not a claimant is disabled are reserved for the Commissioner.”
• “[O]pinions that a claimant is ‘disabled’ or ‘unable to work’ are not medical opinions and are not given special significance because opinions as to whether or not a claimant is disabled are reserved for the Commissioner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).