Lacey Chapman v. Davita, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the party asserting that subject matter jurisdiction exists bears the burden of proof
• “The use of the word ‘shall’ in sections 50-6-203(a) and 50-6-225(a)(1) clearly indicates the legislature’s intention that exhaustion of the benefit review conference process is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).