Lacavera v. Dudas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in order to plausibly allege she was “qualified,” a plaintiff 22 must ordinarily allege she could perform the essential functions of the employment position she 23 held or desired, with or without specified reasonable accommodation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-29· cited 24×
• Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2009-10-21· cited 22×
• Illinois Public Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 2014-06-13· cited 13×
• Tafas v. Doll
  Federal Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 12×
• GHS Health Maintenance Organization, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-04-17· cited 8×
• Winuk v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-06-20· cited 4×
• Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-01-30· cited 4×
• In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-04-25· cited 2×
• Estate of Smith v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-02-13· cited 2×
• Garcia v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  W.D. New York· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
• Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems Parking
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2010-01-28
• Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems Parking
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2009-11-18
• Minnesota Made Hockey, Inc. v. Minnesota Hockey, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2011-05-12
• Chabad of Mid-Hudson Valley v. City of Poughkeepsie
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-08-31
• State v. Bounds
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-04-04