Lac D'Amiante du Quebec v. American Home Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the extension of time [secured under Rule 4(a)(5)] was sufficient to preserve [a prospective intervenor’s] right to appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).