Skip to main content
· 4/6/1990

Labus v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Citations

  • 740 F. Supp. 1053
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9072
  • 52 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1249
  • 1990 WL 85382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing requirement equitably tolled where employee might have been lulled into deferring filing of complaint by employer's representations that he would look for another position for employee within the company
  • “In determining whether an oral contract exists, the court must consider whether the contract is sufficiently clear and capable of judicial enforcement.”
  • “The legitimacy of the representations and the reasonableness of the employee’s reliance are questions for the finder of fact that are not appropriate for summary judgment.”’
  • “The interference alleged must be both intentional and legally or ethically improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.