· 1/28/1986
LaBuda v. LaBuda
Citations
- 503 A.2d 971
- 349 Pa. Super. 524
- 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lump-sum retirement payment accrued prior to separation but received after separation properly included as marital asset.
- consideration of husband’s extramarital affair not improper under § 401(d) where use limited solely to issue of dissipation of marital assets
- Superior court will not address issues not covered in exceptions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Hoffman, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.