Skip to main content
· 1/28/1986

LaBuda v. LaBuda

Citations

  • 503 A.2d 971
  • 349 Pa. Super. 524
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • lump-sum retirement payment accrued prior to separation but received after separation properly included as marital asset.
  • consideration of husband’s extramarital affair not improper under § 401(d) where use limited solely to issue of dissipation of marital assets
  • Superior court will not address issues not covered in exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Hoffman, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.