Labrum v. Utah State Board of Pardons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \considerations of judicial integrity require us to extend the benefit of our decision to petitioner and any [party] who currently has a claim pending in the district court or on appeal\
• noting that “considerations of judicial integrity require us to extend the benefit of our decision to petitioner and any [party] who currently has a claim pending in the district court or on appeal”
• focusing on the problem of \substantial inaccuracies in inmate files ... 'I have seen black men listed as white and Harvard graduates listed with borderline IQ's' \
• requiring enough advance .notice to enable the person to prepare a response
• petitioner sought review under 65B(e) alleging that due process required the board to provide timely notice and copies or summaries of contents of board’s files
• “Due process is flexible and calls for the procedural protections that the given situation demands.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).