LaBounty v. LaBounty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that both UCATA and the plaintiffs release gave the nonsettling defendants “a release [from the plaintiff] in the amount of the pro rata share that [the settling defendant] would otherwise [have been] required to [contribute]”
• holding that both UCATA and the plaintiff's release gave the nonsettling defendants \a release [from the plaintiff] in the amount of the pro rata share that [the settling defendant] would otherwise [have been] required to [contribute]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).