Laborers Local 236, AFLO-CIO v. Scott Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plain language of the statute is the best evidence of legislative intent
• “Government line-drawing that does not infringe a fundamental right and is not based on a suspect classification is subject only to rational-basis review.”
• there is “no constitutional right to force the government to listen to their views.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).