Skip to main content
· 3/17/1972

Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. Groothuis

Citations

  • 494 P.2d 808
  • 1972 Alas. LEXIS 255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it is just as logical to regard the [newly adopted] amendment as a legislative clarification of the original language and not a substantial change”
  • \it is just as logical to regard the [newly adopted] amendment as a legislative clarification of the original language and not a substantial change\
  • where a union and the state employed worker, both held jointly liable for compensation where worker provided at least incidental benefit to the union while primarily on business for the state
  • where a union and the state employed worker, both held jointly liable for compensation where worker provided at least incidental benefit to the union while primarily on business for the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boney, Rabino-Witz, Connor, Erwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.