· 3/17/1972
Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. Groothuis
Citations
- 494 P.2d 808
- 1972 Alas. LEXIS 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is just as logical to regard the [newly adopted] amendment as a legislative clarification of the original language and not a substantial change”
- \it is just as logical to regard the [newly adopted] amendment as a legislative clarification of the original language and not a substantial change\
- where a union and the state employed worker, both held jointly liable for compensation where worker provided at least incidental benefit to the union while primarily on business for the state
- where a union and the state employed worker, both held jointly liable for compensation where worker provided at least incidental benefit to the union while primarily on business for the state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boney, Rabino-Witz, Connor, Erwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.