Laborde v. Scottsdale Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that even if the plaintiff amended his complaint once as a matter of right pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(a), he should have been given another opportunity to amend because he had not abused the privilege
• because no responsive pleading had been filed, the trial court had no discretion to deny a request to amend the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).