Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. v. McConaghy, 02-2666 (2002)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that traditional diversity cases require complete diversity
• CAFA “significantly expanded federal diversity jurisdiction” to “ensure ‘[f]ederal court consideration of interstate cases of national importance.’”
• “Because the focus remains on whether the case ‘is or 10 has become removable,’ counsel’s clairvoyant sense of what actions a plaintiff might take 11 plays no role in the [removal] analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).