Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/26/1985
Labelle v. State
Citations
- 692 S.W.2d 102
- 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a motion to revoke must simply give fair notice of the violation involved in order to comport with minimum due process
- due process requires indictment to inform defendant with sufficient specificity so adequate defense may be prepared
- due process requires indictment to inform defendant with sufficient specificity so adequate defense may be prepared
- complaints regarding the sufficiency of the allegations in a motion to revoke are waived if not raised at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Clinton, Teague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Labelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-19· cited 102×
- Gutierrez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-12-16· cited 84×
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 44×
- Tobias v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-10-05· cited 26×
- Wisenbaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-08-11· cited 21×
- Thomas Lee Spruill A/K/A Mauldin Austin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2012-08-23· cited 17×
- Oliver v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1990-06-13· cited 13×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-19· cited 10×
- Guzman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1993-02-10· cited 9×
- State v. MartinezTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-04-16· cited 8×
- Chaires v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-11-27· cited 8×
- Stanley Lucius Atnipp v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2017-04-20· cited 7×
- Coffin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1993-02-17· cited 5×
- Labelle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 4×
- LaBelle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-02-25· cited 4×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-13· cited 3×
- Mueller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-25· cited 2×
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-21· cited 1×
- Houston Madison Wisenbaker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1993-08-11
- Charles P. Nix v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-06-15
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 339×
- Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-10· cited 161×
- Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-02· cited 150×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-08· cited 144×
- Seaton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-04-05· cited 78×
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-26· cited 75×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-07-21· cited 72×
- Leyva v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-14· cited 68×
- Dennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 66×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 57×
- Lackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-06· cited 56×
- Few v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-26· cited 54×
- Casias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-19· cited 50×
- Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-12· cited 46×
- Kuenstler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-10-18· cited 33×
- Barrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-20· cited 28×
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-30· cited 26×
- Ex Parte CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-02-21· cited 18×
- Ex Parte EldridgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-01· cited 15×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-01· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.