Labelle v. Labelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where husband in trial court consented to intervention of third-party in his dissolution case, he cannot object on appeal to that party’s intervention
• stating, “[T]he protection[s] afforded by Article X, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution ... do not apply to properties which are purchased with fraudulently obtained, traceable proceeds and which are, therefore, subject to the imposition of a constructive trust.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hirchert v. Hirchert Family Trust
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-11· cited 4×
• Hirchert Family Trust v. Hirchert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-17· cited 2×
• Stanley v. Stanley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Castor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 419×
• Mayer v. Cianciolo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-12· cited 9×