Labatt Food Service, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an offeror that submitted an untimely proposal lacked standing to challenge subsequent procurement procedures
• holding that the agency’s acceptance of bid revisions by email did not prejudice protestor because it had no bearing on the agency’s review of final proposals
• holding that the agency’s acceptance of bid revisions by email did not prejudice protestor because it had no bearing on the agency’s review of final proposals
• finding that there was no connection between the government’s error and the protestor’s failure to secure the contract
• detei’mining that a protester lacked standing because there was “no connection” between the government’s error and the protester’s failure to secure a contract
• stating that “non-prejudicial errors in a bid process do not automatically invalidate a procurement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).