LaBart v. Hotel Vendome Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hotel was under no duty to warn of the open and obvious danger created by a wet and soapy shower floor
• holding hotel was under no duty to warn of the open and obvious danger of wet and soapy bathtub that was not equipped with a bathmat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 59×
• Wagner v. Coronet Hotel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-09-08· cited 35×
• Dempsey v. Alamo Hotels, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-12· cited 24×
• Pearce v. Motel 6, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-24· cited 12×
• Wotzka v. Minndakota Limited Partnership
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-06-19· cited 9×
• Early v. John A. Cooper Co.
  W.D. Arkansas· 1969-10-15· cited 4×
• Albinson v. United States
  D. Massachusetts· 1963-04-23

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lincoln Operating Co. v. Gillis
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1953-10-21· cited 62×
• Kitchen v. Women's City Club
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-05-28· cited 32×
• Grace v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1948-01-05· cited 13×