LaBarre v. Credit Acceptance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if plaintiff has such a claim, “it is covered by Minnesota’s comprehensive insurance regulatory scheme set forth in the [MUTPA]”
• “When a remedy at law is inadequate to compensate for non-performance, specific performance may be decreed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).