LaBarge v. Vierkant (In Re Vierkant)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a default judgment entered in violation of the automatic stay is void and cannot be given collateral estoppel effect
• holding that under the circumstances of that case, an action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void ab initio
• holding that a default judgment entered in violation of the stay was void ab initio and had no collateral-estoppel effect
• holding that “action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void ab initio,” rather than merely being voidable
• holding that “an action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void ab initio”
• holding that under the circumstances of that case, an action taken in violation of the automatic stay is void ab initio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).