Skip to main content
· 1/26/1995

Labarge Products, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 1547
  • 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,733
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the regulation alleged to have been violated in that case was “plainly for the benefit of the contractor”
  • “[A] contractor, at its free election, may bring a CDA claim either in the Court of Federal Claims or before the Board . . . ”
  • reformation may be appropriate where Government has engaged in auctioning in violation of FAR prohibition; contractor did not establish price was lower than it would have been because of violation
  • “[T]he bastion of fed- eral procurement policy [is] that all offerors must possess equal knowledge of the same information in order to have a valid procurement.” (quoting Logicon, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 776, 788 (1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Michel, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.