Labajo v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]here is . . . no real conflict between the laws of California and New York for . . . unjust enrichment” and collecting cases laying out the elements of each claim
• “[I]t would be more appropriate for the Court to address the commonality, i.e., conflicts of law analysis, during the class certification stage, after class discovery.”
• consumer who was allegedly deceived by store's free-magazine promotion could not bring negligence claim because \she does not allege any personal injury or property damage\
• “There is . . . no real conflict between the laws of California and New York for breach of contract[.]”
• “When there is a bona fide dispute as to the existence of a contract . . . assertion of a breach of contract claim does not preclude [plaintiff] from pleading an unjust enrichment claim in the alternative.”
• “When there is a bona fide dispute as to the existence of a contract, a party may proceed upon a theory of unjust enrichment, and an unjust enrichment claim may be alleged alongside a breach of contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).