· 2/17/2005
Laas v. Williamson
Citations
- 156 S.W.3d 854
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1361
- 2005 WL 386883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that documents “filed after judgment may be considered in a bill of review proceeding and on appeal from the denial of a bill of review, but not in a restricted appeal”
- stating that documents “filed after judgment may be considered in a bill of review proceeding and on appeal from the denial of a bill of review, but not in a restricted appeal”
- stating that documents A filed after judgment may be considered in a bill of review proceeding and on appeal from the denial of a bill of review, but not in a restricted appeal @
- involving corrected return of citation that was filed as appendix to appellate brief but was not in clerk’s record
- involving corrected return of citation that was filed as appendix to appellate brief but was not in clerk’s record
- involving corrected return of citation that was filed as appendix to appellate brief but was not in clerk = s record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKeithen, Gaultney, Kreger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.